Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join
IAEI Magazine
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (1101) posts »
 

The 2009 IECC: Increased Inspections and Testing Lead to Increased Energy Savings

Posted By Pam Cole, Saturday, May 01, 2010
Updated: Wednesday, January 23, 2013

What’s happening with energy efficiency in existing and new residential homes?

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to improving the most popular model residential energy code by 30% by 2012 and moving to net zero energy homes by 2020. The first major step toward those goals is embodied in the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code® (IECC), which by various estimates is 12% to 15% more energy efficient than its 2006 predecessor. Key new provisions in the 2009 IECC include:

  • Mandatory pressure testing of ducts
  • Mandatory pressure testing of envelope leakage or visual inspection based on a defined checklist
  • Requirement that 50% of all lamps be high efficacy

These changes not only move toward DOE’s goals for improving the code, but are beginning to make their way into state and local building codes, where they will become part of the new standard practices for improving energy efficiency in the residential building industry. In so doing, they will create the need for some new/enhanced inspections and require a new level of testing expertise.

Photo 1

Duct Testing

Prior versions of the IECC have required that ducts not installed within the thermal building envelope1be insulated and sealed, but not until the 2009 edition has there been a requirement that the air tightness be verified by testing. This testing requirement closes what many have considered a loophole in the code, but the new requirement has met some resistance in some places. In some jurisdictions considering adoption of the 2009 IECC questions have been raised:

  • What will be the additional cost of this requirement?
  • Who will be performing the tests?
  • Who will be reviewing the test results?
  • How many additional inspections could this involve?

As an example, College Place, Texas, adopted the 2009 IECC, but amended it to exclude this testing provision and only require a visual inspection of the ducts. However, other areas of the country, such as the state of Washington, have retained the new testing provision. Washington also made a couple of unique amendments to the provisions:

1. All testing must be done by a qualified technician. The minimum qualification requirement is documented attendance at a duct testing training course approved by the building official. The following existing training programs are recognized as equivalent to this requirement:

a. Performance Testing training for new construction
b. Performance Tested Comfort Systems (PTCS) training for existing homes and new construction

2. Duct systems must be designed, sized, and installed using recognized industry standards and International Residential Code® (IRC) requirements, so that calculated heating and/or cooling loads are delivered to each zone.


Photo 2. Air Sealing — Drain pipe with spray foam insulation

Since the adoption of Washington’s new code, which will become effective July 1, 2010, they have been providing training throughout the state to code officials, builders, architects and contractors on verifying duct air tightness. More information can be found athttp://www.energy.wsu.edu/code/default.cfm

What are the specific duct testing requirements of the 2009 IECC?

The 2009 IECC offers the builder quite a bit of flexibility in meeting its duct tightness requirements. The test can be done either immediately after rough-in of the ducts or later, after the home is completed. Testing at rough-in makes it easier to correct leaks without tearing down building components or using potentially more costly in-duct sealing equipment. Testing at home completion, on the other hand, allows testing the amount of leakage to outdoors rather than simply the total leakage, the theory being that leaks to the indoors are not as bad as leaks to outdoors.

The code leaves it to the local official to determine who must conduct the test. Some will allow the duct installer to do the testing on the theory that the installer can find and correct leaks more quickly and at less cost if s/he is the one doing the test. Others may require a third-party tester.

The specific test requirements are based on the flow rate of air at a specified pressure of 25 Pascals when register boots are sealed shut. The requirement is normalized by the size of the home and expressed per 100 ft2of conditioned floor area:

Post construction test

Maximum of 8 CFM/100ft2leakage to outdoors

–ORMaximum of 12 CFM/100ft2total leakage

Rough-in test

Maximum of 6 CFM/100ft2total leakage

– ORMaximum of 4 CFM/100ft2total leakage if air handler is not installed at the time of the test

Building Envelope Leakage Verification

Sealing the building thermal envelope has been a provision in the energy code for many years. The provisions were somewhat vague and only required that where there are areas of air leakage such as joints, seams, and utility penetrations the area should be sealed with a durable material such as caulking, gasketing or weather stripping. The 2009 IECC now provides for better verification of air sealing by requiring either a whole-house pressure test or visual inspection against a detailed checklist. For visual inspections, the code official may require an approved independent party to inspect and verify that the air barrier2 provisions have been met. This would eliminate the need for possible additional inspections performed by the building department.

Photo 3. Air sealing wiring penetrations at electrical box. Sealant is RTV high temperature silicone caulk to comply with fire code requirements.

In adopting the 2009 IECC, Washington State amended the air sealing requirements to exclude the visual inspection option for new homes and any new addition greater than 500 square feet. The testing may be done by the builder or contractor, eliminating the need for an independent third party to run the tests. Builders who decide to do their own testing will need to purchase the equipment and train personnel. Eliminating the option for visual inspections reduces the labor required of the code official for inspections. Other states and jurisdictions that adopt the 2009 IECC will need to develop protocols and processes to confirm that proper air sealing has been demonstrated and meets the provisions of the code.

What are the new air sealing requirements in the 2009 IECC?

Testing Option– The specific test requirements are based on the flow rate of air produced by a "blower door” at a specified pressure of 50 Pascals when exterior doors are closed, dampers are closed but not otherwise sealed, exterior openings for continuous ventilation systems and heat recovery ventilators are closed but not sealed, HVAC systems are turned off, and duct supply and return registers are not covered or sealed. The requirement is expressed in air changes per hour (ACH), which takes account of the overall size (volume) of the home:

Total air leakage < 7 ACH (air changes per hour)

What is a blower door? It is a powerful fan that attaches and seals to the door (typically the entrance door to the home) and blows air into or out of the house to pressurize or depressurize the home. The inside-outside pressure difference will cause air to force its way through any cracks in the building thermal envelope. Measuring the flow rate at the specified test pressure gives an indication of the leakiness of the envelope.

Visual Inspection Option– building envelope tightness and insulation installation is considered acceptable when the items in Table 402.4.2 of the 2009 IECC, applicable to the method of construction, are field verified (see figure 1).


Figure 1. IECC-2009, Table 402.4.2 Air Barrier and Insulation Inspection Component Criteria

High Efficacy Lighting

The 2009 IECC adds lighting to the scope of the residential code for the first time. The new requirement specifies that 50% of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures be "high efficacy.” What’s even more interesting is that this applies to existing buildings when more than 50% of the luminaires in a space are replaced. Situations could include buildings restored due to fire damage, extensive remodels, or upgrading the home to meet federal tax incentives. The termspaceis used differently thanbuilding or addition. An example would be remodeling a kitchen and replacing the lighting. If more than 50% of the luminaires in the kitchen space are replaced, then 50% of the new lamps installed in permanent lighting fixtures must be high efficacy lamps. Building departments required to enforce the 2009 IECC will need to evaluate their current permitting and inspection process to include lighting plan reviews and inspections to document that lighting provisions have been met.
 

Figure 2. Status of State Residential Energy Code adoption

The 2009 IECC®, Chapter 2, defineshigh efficacy lampsas compact fluorescent lamps, T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent lamps, or lamps with a minimum efficacy of:

60 lumens per watt for lamps > 40 watts,
50 lumens per watt for lamps > 15 watts and ≤ 40 watts, and
40 lumens per watt for lamps < 15 watts

Why pay attention to these new duct testing, air leakage, and lamp efficacy requirements in the 2009 IECC? Currently, fourteen states have officially adopted the 2009 IECC. Of these states, six will have an effective date in the latter part of 2010 or early 2011. Within the next three years, approximately thirty-three states will have adopted and implemented the 2009 IECC or something equivalent or more stringent, as shown in figure 2. As more states put these requirements in place, the number of your projects that may be affected is likely to increase. Becoming familiar with the new requirements now before they are required is likely a good approach to most effectively incorporating them into the building process.

References

12009 IECC®, Chapter 2, Definitions; Building Thermal Envelope – The basement walls, exterior walls, floor, roof, and any other building element that enclose conditioned space. This boundary also includes the boundary between conditioned space and any exempt or unconditioned space.<

22009 IECC®, Chapter 2, Definitions; Air Barrier – material(s) assembled and joined together to provide a barrier to air leakage through the building envelope. An air barrier may be a single material or a combination of materials. 2009 IECC®, Chapter 2, Definitions; Building Thermal Envelope – The basement walls, exterior walls, floor, roof, and any other building element that enclose conditioned space. This boundary also includes the boundary between conditioned space and any exempt or unconditioned space.


Read more by Pam Cole

Tags:  Featured  May-June 2010 

Share |
Permalink | Comments (0)