Subscribe via RSS Feed

Tag: "OSHA"

US Department of Labor determines it will not adopt an SDoC system

[ 1 ] By  |  December 20, 2010  |  Industry News

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration today announced that it will not abandon its system for ensuring that electrical products used in the workplace are safe.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

NEMA Position on SDoC Endorsed by OSHA

[ 0 ] By  |  December 20, 2010  |  Industry News

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced that it will continue to require third-party certification via the Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) program for electrical products used in American workplaces and refrain from adopting Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC).

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

U.S. Department of Labor’s OSHA cites MillerCoors in Golden, Colo., for violations of Occupational Safety and Health Act

[ 0 ] By  |  September 11, 2009  |  Industry News

DENVER — The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has cited MillerCoors LLC in Golden, Colo., with 10 alleged safety and health violations from two investigations involving the death of one and the injury of two workers. OSHA launched an investigation into the company’s safety and health practices following the death [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Occupational Electrical Injury and Fatality Trends and Statistics: 1992–2007

Occupational Electrical Injury and Fatality Trends and Statistics: 1992–2007

[ 0 ] By  |  May 5, 2009  |  

Next year we will commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Since its creation, overall workplace fatalities have been cut by more than 60 percent and occupational injury and illness rates have declined by 40 percent. All of this occurred during an era of unprecedented growth [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Photo 1. This electrical worker is wearing NFPA 70E Hazard Risk Category 1 personal protective equipment (PPE), which is rated for 4 calories per square centimeter (4 cm2). Typically, a worker wearing Hazard Risk Category 1 PPE would also be wearing a hard hat for head protection. Photo copyright 2005 Oberon Company

Maintenance Concerns Should Be a Call to Action for Electrical Inspectors

[ 0 ] By  |  May 6, 2008  |  IAEI May-June 2008

Simply put, the lifeblood of industrial facilities is electrical power. Production processes, environmental controls and security, lighting and safety systems would grind to a halt without a clean, reliable and continuously available flow of electricity. It is well understood by industrial facility owners and managers, and electrical inspectors that overcurrent protective devices like circuit breakers [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Figure 1. System versus equipment grounding

Using Technology to Reduce Risk and Improve Worker Safety

[ 0 ] By  |  May 21, 2004  |  IAEI May-June 2004

Empirical data indicates that around 80 percent of all electrical interruptions are attributable to ground faults that are a result of an unintentional connection between system conductors and ground. The term grounding is commonly used in the electrical industry to mean both “”equipment grounding”” and “system grounding.” System grounding means the intentional connection of a [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)

Implementing 70E in the Electrical Construction Workplace

[ 0 ] By  |  May 29, 2003  |  IAEI May-June 2003

The development of NFPA 70E–2000 provides a roadmap for any employer to develop an extremely effective electrical safety program, which if followed, would most probably eliminate future electrical injury and fatalities. I believe there would also be a side benefit of increasing both management’s and their electricians’ overall safety awareness of other hazards as well. [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Photo 1. Typical "Spider box" supplies GFCI protected receptacles for use on construction sites.

NEC and OSHA: Protecting Workers from Electrical Shock

[ 0 ] By  |  November 16, 2000  |  IAEI November-December 2000

Perhaps the greatest advancement in worker safety over the past 30 years has been the development and implementation of ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) protection. Both the National Electrical Code (NEC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have initiated requirements designed to afford a superior level of protection for both employees and the general public [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 2.50 out of 5)

The Cost of Losing an Arm

[ 0 ] By  |  January 7, 1999  |  IAEI January-February 1999

Tom had flash burns to his face. Fortunately, he had been wearing safety glasses. What was left of his right arm had to be amputated above the elbow. He was in the hospital for almost four months. The medical care and physical therapy would continue for years. Tom said that he and two experienced linemen [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Bad Behavior has blocked 2662 access attempts in the last 7 days.