|
| |
 |
| Figure 1 |
This regulation is accomplished by inserting a ferrous
magnetic shunt (fig. 1) into the transformer core, such that
the magnetic flux from the primary winding has an alternate
(although high impedance) path around the secondary winding. |
|
Figure 2 |
We may
electrically model this type of transformer as a conventional
transformer which has an inductor in series with each of its
high voltage secondary leads2 (fig.
2) |
|
| Figure 3 or Figure 4 |
| Depending on the exact configuration of
shunts and secondary windings, a transformer may be referred
to as having either a "balanced" (fig.
3) or an
"unbalanced" (fig.
4) design, and this in turn
determines what types of secondary wiring methods may be used. |
| |
| |
|
|
|

IAEI
News>Issue Listing>January/February 2000 >Determining Proper Loading for Neon Sign Transformers
| Determining Proper Loading for Neon Sign Transformers |
After a review of the basic difference between ordinary transformers and neon sign transformers, the author explores alternate loading techniques. |
|

Neon sign
transformers differ from most other types of transformers
one is likely to encounter. Unlike a more conventional
transformer, for normal operation a neon sign transformer
is specified to operate a minimum, as well as a maximum
load. Why is this? To understand this requirement, we must
look at what makes a neon sign
transformer different from other types.
Basics
Neon tubes require a high voltage at a low
current to operate. This power is supplied by a specialized
transformer. Secondary voltages typically range from 1,000 to
15,000 volts, and secondary currents range from 20 to 60
milliamps (and higher, for large diameter "cold
cathode" tubing). The current passing through a neon tube
needs to be limited by some means, otherwise once the tube
lights, the current will rise to an excessively high value.
This regulation is accomplished by inserting a ferrous
magnetic shunt (fig. 1) into the transformer core, such that
the magnetic flux from the primary winding has an alternate
(although high impedance) path around the secondary winding.
As the current draw on the transformer secondary winding
increases, more primary magnetic flux diverts1 through the
magnetic shunt. While this gives the transformer a poor
voltage regulation characteristic, it also tends to keep the
neon tube operating current reasonably constant. We may
electrically model this type of transformer as a conventional
transformer which has an inductor in series with each of its
high voltage secondary leads2 (fig.
2).
Note that some transformers may have more
than one secondary winding and more than one secondary shunt.
If a transformer has two secondary windings, the midpoint
connection between the secondaries may be grounded to the
transformer case. Depending on the exact configuration of
shunts and secondary windings, a transformer may be referred
to as having either a "balanced" (fig.
3) or an
"unbalanced" (fig.
4) design, and this in turn
determines what types of secondary wiring methods may be used.
Refer to the transformer manufacturer’s literature for more
details on this.
This constant current nature of neon sign
transformers allows one to greatly vary the tube loading on a
transformer. Unfortunately, one can radically misload a
transformer and it will still appear to work, in the short
term. Long term, transformer failure will usually result. For
any given transformer, the tube load should fall within
specified limits. It must not be too high or too low3. The
question is, how does one determine the proper loading?
Methods of
Determining Proper Loading
There are several answers to this question.
The most commonly used method is by reference to manufacturer
supplied loading charts. These charts indicate the minimum and
maximum total length of neon tubing that may be used on a
given transformer, as a function of the tube diameter, gas
fill pressure and type of gas used (typically either straight
neon or an argon/neon/mercury vapor mix). When using a chart,
one deducts some amount of tube length for each pair of
electrodes used (which occurs when multiple tubes are wired in
series.) Other rules-of-thumb allow compensation for
connecting tubes of varying diameters and gas fills in series.
While this loading method seems straightforward and simple
enough, and is certainly a good place to start in determining
proper transformer loading, it does not always produce the
desired results. This is because neon tubes may not exhibit
the standard characteristics the loading charts are based on,
due to processing variations and other factors. Therefore, we
need to understand a little more about transformer
characteristics, and look at some alternate loading
techniques.
Checking Transformers
In the USA, neon sign transformers are
rated primarily in terms of their open circuit secondary
voltage and their short-circuit secondary current. While these
ratings are specifically intended for use in calculating
proper loading, they are also useful in determining if a neon
sign transformer is functioning properly. The open circuit
voltage may be measured with a good voltmeter, equipped with a
high voltage probe. Typically, the higher voltage transformers
(6000 volts and above) have their secondary winding midpoints
grounded to the transformer case. The voltmeter common lead is
connected to the case and a voltage measurement is made at
either secondary terminal. The sum of these readings should
equal the secondary rating. Be sure to measure the primary
voltage, as the open circuit secondary voltage will vary
proportionally with the primary voltage.
Secondary current may be measured by
connecting an AC milliamp meter directly across the secondary
terminals. The transformer will withstand this short circuit
for a reasonable amount of time, because the magnetic shunts
previously described allow what would otherwise be seen as
abuse to be tolerated by the transformer primary winding.
Again, the current reading should be reasonably close to the
secondary short circuit value on the transformer rating plate.
Be sure to check the manufacturer’s
literature for their specific recommendations on testing SGFP
type transformers, as the above general test methods may not
work properly.
This brings us to a second method of
determining proper transformer loading. For US made
transformers, the typical transformer secondary operating
current is approximately 80 percent of the rated short circuit
current. For a transformer rated at 30 mA, this would be
approximately 24 mA. We can connect a milliamp meter in series
with a transformer’s tube load and measure this current.
Various manufacturers make high voltage milliamp meters
specifically for this task.
European Methods
I am told that in some areas of Europe,
transformers are specified somewhat differently than in the
USA. Typically, a transformer is rated in terms of its open
circuit secondary voltage, its operating secondary current,
and its "G" factor. The "G" factor is the
desired ratio of loaded to open circuit secondary voltage.
Typically, the "G" factor is around 0.5 (although
this may vary), meaning for example that a transformer rated
at 9000 volt open circuit should operate with a tube load
connected at around 4500 volts. This may be measured
conveniently with a voltmeter equipped with a high voltage
probe. This is the preferred method of checking the loading on
a European transformer, and in practice is somewhat easier and
more sensitive than measuring the tube operating current. This
method is starting to catch on in the USA as well.
Unfortunately, US manufacturers don’t specify the
"G" factor, but typically a value of 0.5 may be
assumed.
One quick note here: when replacing a
European transformer, the "G" factor must be taken
into account. A replacement transformer with a different
"G" factor will not operate a given tube load
properly, even though its rated open circuit secondary voltage
and operating current may be the same as the that of the
original transformer.
Choosing a Loading
Check Method
One would think that by using a loading
chart in combination with measuring the secondary operating
current and voltage that correct tube loading may always be
determined. Unfortunately this is not always the case. There
is one more variable in the mix: stray capacitance. This
capacitance results from the close proximity of high voltage
secondary wiring to its enclosing conduit (or other grounded
metal objects), and between the neon tubing and the sign sheet
metal. It is desirable to minimize this capacitance as much as
possible. This means that any secondary wiring operating at
high voltage relative to ground should be kept as short as
practical, as capacitance varies directly with wire length.
Various standardized wiring techniques, such as
"mid-point return" and "virtual mid-point"
have been devised to accomplish this goal. Both of these
techniques involve keeping the wiring between the transformer
and the electrodes on the first tube as short and direct as
possible. Needless to say, the wiring techniques used must
comply both with those methods allowed by the transformer
manufacturer and with methods allowed by the NEC (for
US installations), or with the appropriate European
regulations for installations done there.
So what happens when capacitance intrudes
in a neon installation? Two things, both bad. First,
capacitance tends to counteract the current regulation of the
neon sign transformer. Specifically, it tends to cancel the
inductance in the secondary circuit of our previously
described transformer model. This can cause excessive
secondary, and thus, tube current. Unfortunately, installers
tend to counteract this effect by adding additional tubing
load to the transformer, or by selecting a smaller
transformer. While this tends to restore the operating
current, it is at the expense of operating voltage, which
tends to rise excessively, leading to transformer failure.
This is why both the operating voltage and current should be
checked.
With some types of NEC 600-23(b)
SGFP type transformers, the stray capacitance seen by either
transformer secondary terminal should be similar. An imbalance
may be interpreted by the protection circuitry inside the
transformer as a fault, causing "nuisance tripping."
One of the best ways to avoid this situation is to insure that
the GTO wires connected to either transformer secondary
terminal be reasonably equal in length, as well as keeping
them as short as possible.
Second, stray capacitance in combination
with higher voltage transformers (typically units over 9000
volts) operating neon-filled tubes may invite transformer
secondary circuit oscillations. These oscillations sometimes
manifest themselves as flickering tubes and
"buzzing" transformers, and are extremely
destructive to both the transformer and to the high voltage
wiring. Neither a voltmeter or a milliamp meter will
conclusively detect this condition. Using an oscilloscope4
equipped with a high voltage probe, these oscillations may be
easily seen. Other than reducing the capacitance as much as
possible by mechanical methods, the best solution to this
problem is to re-layout the sign wiring to use lower voltage
transformers. This will, of course, require using more
transformers to do the job.
Solid State
Transformers
We have neglected to include so-called
"solid state" transformers in our discussions of
proper loading. This is because the operating frequencies used
by these transformers preclude the use of regular voltmeters
and milliamp meters, as they do not function well at these
frequencies. The oscilloscope still works well, but few sign
shops have them. On the other hand, most of these transformers
are designed to operate with widely varying loads. When using
these transformers, it is best to carefully follow the
recommendations in the manufacturers’ data sheets.
Acknowledgments
Before publishing, this article has been
passed for review to the members of the INA "Codes and
Installation Forum." I would like to thank everyone who
reviewed this article for content and accuracy. Your
assistance is greatly appreciated.
1 This is a bit of a simplification, but
for purposes of illustration, it’s close enough.
2 Specifically, this is a model of a
"balanced" midpoint grounded type of transformer.
See figure 3 for a physical illustration.
3 A note on terminology: sign installers
refer to a transformer as being "overloaded" or
"underloaded" with tubing. Unfortunately, this
refers to the length of tubing connected, not the electrical
condition, which tends to be the opposite of that of the
tubing. This is to say, when a transformer is "underloaded"
with tubing, the transformer tends to draw excessive primary
winding current.
4 Unfortunately, this type of equipment
has been, in the past, both expensive and awkward to use in
the field. Newer compact / portable equipment coming into
the marketplace may make this measurement technique more
practical in the future.
Telford Dorr received a BSEE in both
electrical and electronic engineering from California State
Polytechnic University at Pomona in 1973.
Dorr is involved in the industrial process
control industry as part owner and VP of engineering of
Flowcon, which specializes in computer controlled batch
weighing equipment. He is also owner of Microtron, which
specializes in custom control (sequencing and fading) for neon
signs / lighting.
Currently, Dorr is a member of the
International Neon Association and is the chair of the INA
Technical Committee. He may be reached via email at TMJDORR@
compuserve.com
|
|
|