|
| |
 |
| Figure
1 |
| A good job safety will help determine the appropriate
PPE for the task. |
|
| Figure
2 |
| Potential high energy and available fault currents
require specialized PPP. |
|
| Figure
3 |
| Routine tasks, such as current readings, require
appropriate PPE. |
|
|
|

IAEI
News>Issue Listing>May/June 2000 >How Comfortable Are You?
The electrical inspector and electrician, like other craftsman, achieve a level of comfort with the tasks they perform on a regular and routine basis which increases the potential for complacency; and in the electrical industry, there is no room for complacency. |
|

The Hazards of
Electricity
The electrical inspector and electrician are no
different from any other craftsman. As they accumulate more
experience and expertise in their field they begin to achieve
a level of comfort with the tasks they perform on a regular
and routine basis. Unfortunately, as the comfort level
increases, the potential for complacency can begin to set in.
In the electrical industry, there is no room for complacency.
"Ordinary" and "routine" tasks, such as
verifying voltage, taking current readings, and even visual
inspection of live or energized parts, can subject the
inspector and electrician to the multiple hazards of
electricity.
For the past several years, an increasing
amount of information has emerged concerning the multiple
hazards of electricity. For many years, we assumed the
electrical shock was the only hazard to be considered. Recent
studies have shown that additional concerns must include the
damaging effects of arc-blasts and arc-flashes. Consideration
must be given to the devastating forces generated in
arc-blasts when molten copper expands to 67,000 times its
original value as it vaporizes. Likewise, arc temperatures can
reach 35,000°F causing fatal burns at distances up to 10 ft
and the pressure wave generated by the blast can reach upwards
of 2,000 lbs/sq.ft., certainly enough pressure to rupture
eardrums or even collapse the lungs. It is especially
important to consider that as our electrical distribution
systems continue to grow in size and capacity, the potential
for higher and higher available fault currents and
significantly greater arc-blasts and arc-faults rises sharply.
For these reasons, electrical inspectors, electricians and
anyone who works on or near energized circuits or equipment
must be on constant guard that even the routine tasks they
perform on a regular basis are done in a manner which affords
the highest possible degree of personnel protection.
Figure
1. A good job safety will help determine the appropriate
PPE for the task.
Figure
2. Potential high energy and available fault currents
require specialized PPP.
Figure
3. Routine tasks, such as current readings, require
appropriate PPE.
First
Step: Are You Qualified?
The OSHA electrical safety-related work practices
standard establishes guidelines for both the
"qualified" person and the "unqualified."
Unfortunately, the OSHA General Industry, Electrical
Standards, give very little direction in determining and
defining what skills are necessary to be considered
"qualified." Fortunately, NFPA 70E-1995, Standard
for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces
defines a qualified person in Section 2-2.1. as one
"trained and knowledgeable of the construction and
operations of equipment or a specific work method, and be
trained to recognize and avoid the electrical hazards that
might be present with respect to that equipment or work
method. Such persons shall also be familiar with the proper
use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective
equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated
tools and test equipment. A person can be considered qualified
with respect to certain equipment and methods but still be
unqualified for others." As a first step, employers
should evaluate all employee’s skills to determine if they
have the necessary knowledge and training to perform work on
or near energized electrical circuits and equipment. Those
that have inadequate training or knowledge must maintain
minimum approach distances in the direction of live parts to
ensure their protection. At a minimum they should be trained
in and be very familiar with proper approach distances for
unqualified persons.
De-energize
First
To protect electricians and other workers exposed to
the hazards of electricity, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) established guidelines which must be
followed to protect against the damaging effects of
electricity. In general, these are referred to as
"Electrical Safety-Related Work Practices." These
work practices were originally developed under direction from
OSHA in NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements
for Employee Workplaces. In general, both NFPA 70E and OSHA
1910 Subpart S, Electrical Standards require electrical
circuits and equipment to be de-energized before work is
performed on or near them. Note that "de-energized"
is defined as being placed into an electrically safe work
condition by locking out and tagging the circuit and
equipment. For circuits 50-volts and above, work is not
permitted to be performed on or near live parts unless the
employer can demonstrate that de-energizing the circuit or
equipment introduces additional or increased hazards or is
infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations.
Note that the definition of "infeasible" does not
include considerations such as cost or convenience.
Infeasibility is intended to apply to equipment operational
limitations. For example, measuring voltage or taking current
readings is not possible with the circuit or equipment
de-energized and would require that the task be performed with
the circuit in an energized condition. Too often, accidents
occur when electricians fail to de-energize or request that
circuits be de-energized first. Typically, accident reports
indicate that work was performed in an energized condition
because it would have been "inconvenient" or would
have cost too much to de-energize the circuit or equipment.
Working
Hot
When the employer demonstrates that it would create an
additional or greater hazard or it is infeasible to
de-energize the circuit, other safety-related work practices
must be employed to protect workers when work on or near
energized circuits or equipment must occur. These safety
related work practices vary with the specific task and hazards
associated with the job and must be suitable for the
conditions under which the work is to be performed and for the
voltage level of the exposed electric conductors or circuit
parts. Typically they may include, the use of all necessary
personal protective equipment, insulating blankets, shields or
barriers, insulating tools and protective clothing. These
provisions apply to all circuits and equipment which operate
at 50-volts and over. Because of the multiple hazards
associated with this type of work, a complete job safety
analysis should be completed before performing the work. This
analysis should include careful consideration of the specific
hazards associated with the task. The proper selection of the
appropriate safety-related work practices and personal
protective equipment is determined from this analysis.
Conclusion
Unfortunately, many electricians today fail to follow
or completely adhere to the OSHA regulations and NFPA 70E
recommendations. Instead, they choose to ignore the minimum
safety-related work practices and fail to utilize proper
personal protective equipment. Frequently, electrical workers
and other personnel who work on or near energized electrical
circuits and equipment, without the necessary PPE become
statistics, highlighting the dangers associated with
electrical work. A decision to work circuits and equipment in
an energized condition should only be made after a
determination has been made that it would be infeasible or
that it would create a greater hazard to de-energize. Once
that demonstration has been made, a job hazard analysis should
be performed to evaluate all of the possible hazards
associated with the tasks. The specific safety-related work
practices, personal protective equipment and insulating tools
necessary for the task should be apparent after the job hazard
analysis is complete. Finally, a job briefing should be
conducted prior to beginning the task to ensure that each of
the employees involved with the task understand his or her
responsibilities and the hazards associated with those
responsibilities.
Michael I. Callanan serves on the National Joint
Apprenticeship & Training Committee. He is director of
Safety, Codes & Standards and is principal member of the
National Electrical Code Technical Correlating Committee.
Callanan also serves on NFPA 70E, NFPA 70B and is chairman,
NFPA 79.
|
|
|