
IAEI
News>Issue Listing>November/December 2002 >Intrinsic Safety
Intrinsic safety is the method of protection for control and instrumentation circuits where the nominal voltage is 24 VDC or less and the current is normally less than 100 mA. |
|

Intrinsic safety is the method of
protection for control and instrumentation circuits where the
nominal voltage is 24 VDC or less and the current is normally
less than 100 mA. The concept of intrinsic safety is to limit
the voltage and current so that there is never a spark with
enough energy to create an explosion. Intrinsic safety when
properly used removes the ignition from the explosion
triangle.
There are three components to an
intrinsically safe circuit: the field device, intrinsically
safe barrier and field wiring.
• Field devices known as intrinsically
safe apparatus are classified as simple or complex.
• Simple apparatus, which do not need
to be approved, are non-energy storing devices such as
contacts, thermocouples, RTDs, LEDs and resistors.
• Complex apparatus such as
transmitters, solenoids, relays and transducers may store
excess energy and need to be approved by a third party.
• Contacts, transmitters and
temperature sensors are the most commonly used field devices
in intrinsically safe applications.
• The intrinsically safe barrier limits
the current with a resistor and the voltage with a zener
diode.
• Intrinsically safe circuits are
designed so that they operate properly under normal
conditions, but keep the energy levels below the ignition
curves when a fault condition occurs.
Three components to a barrier limit current
and voltage: a resistor, at least two zener diodes, and a
fuse. The resistor limits the current to a specific value
known as the short-circuit current(Isc). The zener diode
limits the voltage to a value referred to as open-circuit
voltage (Voc). The fuse will blow when the diode conducts.
This interrupts the circuit, which prevents the diode from
burning and allowing excess voltage to reach the hazardous
area. There always are at least two zener diodes in parallel
in each intrinsically safe barrier. If one diode should fail,
the other will operate providing complete protection.
A simple analogy is a restriction in a
water pipe with an overpressure shutoff valve. The restriction
prevents too much water from flowing through the point, just
like the resistor in the barrier limits current. If too much
pressure builds up behind the restriction, the overpressure
shutoff valve turns off all the flow in the pipe. This is
similar to what the zener diode and fuse do with excess
voltage. If the input voltage exceeds the allowable limit, the
diode shorts the input voltage to ground and the fuse blows,
shutting off electrical power to the hazardous area.
Determining
Safe Energy Levels
Voltage and current limitations are ascertained by ignition
curves, as seen in figure
4. A circuit with a combination of 30 V and 150 mA would
fall on the ignition level of gases in Group A. This
combination of voltage and current could create a spark large
enough to ignite the mixture of gases and oxygen.
Intrinsically safe applications always stay below these curves
where the operating level of energy is about 1 watt or less.
There also are capacitance and inductance curves which must be
examined in intrinsically safe circuits.
Figure
1. Barrier circuit with an intrinsically safe barrier
Consider the ignition curves to demonstrate
a point about thermocouples. A thermocouple is classified as a
simple device. It will not create or store enough energy to
ignite any mixture of volatile gases. If the energy level of a
typical thermocouple circuit were plotted on the ignition
curve in figure 2,
it would not be close to the ignition levels of the most
volatile gases in Group A. Is the thermocouple which is
installed in a hazardous area (see figure
3) intrinsically safe? The answer is no, because a fault
could occur on the recorder which could cause excess energy to
reach the hazardous area, as seen in figure
4. To make sure that the circuit remains intrinsically
safe, a barrier to limit the energy must be inserted (see figure
5).
Approvals--Start
with the Field Device
All intrinsically safe circuits have three components: the
field device referred to as the intrinsically safe apparatus,
the energy-limiting device also known as the barrier or
intrinsically safe associated apparatus, and the field wiring.
The design of the intrinsically safe circuit begins with the
analysis of the field device. This will determine the type of
barrier that can be used so that the circuit functions
properly under normal operating conditions but is still safe
under fault conditions.
An intrinsically safe apparatus (field
device) is classified either as a simple or non-simple device.
Simple apparatus is defined in paragraph 3.12 of the
ANSI/ISA-RP12 12.6-1987 as any device which will neither
generate nor store more than 1.2 volts, 0.1 amps, 25 mW or 20
µJ. Examples are simple contacts, thermocouples, RTDs, LEDs,
nonincendive potentiometers and resistors. These simple
devices do not need to be listed as intrinsically safe (see
504.4, Exception). If they are connected to an approved
intrinsically safe apparatus (barrier), the circuit is
considered intrinsically safe.
A non-simple device can create or store
levels of energy that exceed those listed above. Typical
examples are transmitters, transducers, solenoid valves, and
relays. When these devices are approved as intrinsically safe,
under the entity concept, they have the following entity
parameters: Vmax (maximum voltage allowed); Imax (maximum
current allowed); Ci (internal capacitance) and Li (internal
inductance).
The Vmax and Imax values are
straightforward. Under a fault condition, excess voltage or
current could be transferred to the intrinsically safe
apparatus (field device). If the voltage or current exceeds
the apparatus Vmax or Imax, the device can heat up or spark
and ignite the gases in the hazardous area. The Ci and Li
values describe the devices’ ability to store energy in the
form of internal capacitance and internal inductance.
Photo
1. Cooper Crouse-Hinds offers grounded and isolated
intrinsically safe barriers in addition to intrinsically safe
remote I/O.
Photo
2. Terminal boxes and conduits carrying intrinsically safe
circuits must be separated from all other wiring and properly
labeled.
Photo
3. Intrinsically safe circuits can be worked on while live
without danger of creating sparks with enough energy to cause
ignition.
Limiting
Energy to the Field Device
To protect the intrinsically safe apparatus in a hazardous
area, an energy-limiting device (barrier) must be installed.
Under normal conditions, the device allows the intrinsically
safe apparatus to function properly. Under fault conditions,
it protects the field circuit by preventing excess voltage and
current from reaching the hazardous area. When conducting the
safety analysis or inspection of the circuit, it is important
to compare the entity values of the intrinsically safe
apparatus against the associated apparatus. These parameters
usually are found on the product or in the control-wiring
diagram from the manufacturer.

Intrinsically
Safe Barriers
Three types of barriers are most commonly used:
1. Zener barriers—passive devices which
required grounding for safety
2. Isolation barriers—do not require
grounding and contain additional electronics for isolation and
signal conditioning, or
3. Ex-ia I/O—combines I/O with intrinsic
safety into one package.
Grounded
Zener Barriers
Grounded barriers, also referred to as zener barriers, are
passive devices which contain zener diodes to limit excess
voltage, resistors to limit current and fuses. These are the
basic building blocks which are contained in all other
intrinsically safe barriers. There is always a voltage drop
across grounded barriers because of the resistors so some
selection is required as well as a ground connection. This
selection has been greatly simplified in recent years as
manufacturers make them more application specific. Grounded
barriers are also very versatile and can be applied in many
other applications. If your application has less than 20
outputs or inputs and grounding is not a consideration, this
may be the best solution.
DIN
Rail Grounded Barriers
Advantages include:
• lowest initial cost per unit;
• very small < 1/2" wide;
• very precise signal response;
• small power requirements; and
• versatile for "other"
circuits.
Other considerations include:
• requires ground; and
• barrier resistance can influence
circuit function.
Isolation Barriers
DIN rail isolated barriers, also referred to as
transformer-isolated or galvanically-isolated barriers, are
zener barriers with additional electronics to isolate and
condition the signals. Adding the isolation has the advantage
that an intrinsically safe-ground connection is not required.
The signal conditioning of isolated barriers simplifies the
selection process as each isolated barrier is manufactured for
specific functions such as switching, temperature measurements
or 4-20 mA readings. These isolated units are ideal for
digital inputs or for OEMs where grounding may cause problems
at the local installation.
Din Rail Isolated
Barriers
Advantages include:
• does not require IS ground;
• loop layout and barrier selection is
easier; and
• integrated signal conditioning.
Other considerations include:
• higher cost than grounded barriers;
• larger width ˜1" wide; and
• larger power requirements.
Remove
I/O Products
Until recently there were limited improvements made in this
industry. The latest generation of products now reduce the
total installed cost by combining the intrinsically safe
barriers with the I/O eliminating extra hardware. These new
systems called intrinsically safe remote I/O can be mounted
almost anywhere in hazardous or ordinary locations reducing
the wiring and terminations. These systems were initially
designed for the German Chemical industry which wanted to
reduce installation costs and no longer had enough space in
control rooms to house termination panels. Their reasoning was
to extend the 2-wire communication lines out as far away as
possible in the process area to minimize field wiring to the
sensors and extra termination cabinets.
Signals to and from the hazardous area are
made intrinsically safe, processed by the remote I/O
electronics, and transmitted to a memory module through a
communication link that is normally mounted on the backplane,
which holds the electronics. These signals are updated every 5
milliseconds and stored for pickup and transport to the main
control system. The intrinsically safe remote I/O system is
connected to the controller by a simple 2-wire or fiber optic
link to relay information back and forth.
These systems are ideal for users, who want
to eliminate wiring from the control system to the I/O and can
communicate via a bus system such as Modbus, Profibus, or
Fieldbus.
Intrinsically
Safe Remote I/O Systems
Advantages include:
• lowest installed cost (40 percent
savings);
• uses digital communications for more
accurate and faster readings;
• easy product selection;
• least amount of wiring;
• no ground required; and
• easiest add-on for future.
Other considerations include:
• some expertise required in
"systems."
Remember the keys to intrinsic safety are:
• it is used only on instrumentation and
control circuits that operate on 24 volts or less;
• it is not used on power circuits of 30
volts and definitely not 120 volts and above;
• it is used in Division 1 and Zones 0
and 1 areas; and
• intrinsic safety barriers prevent
ignition of volatile gases and dusts by limiting the voltage
and current into hazardous areas.
Three solutions depend on the number of
devices that need to be protected in the hazardous area
ranging from simple passive devices which require grounding,
isolated devices which do not need a ground, and the
intrinsically safe remote I/O which eliminates hardware and
field wiring.
Select
the Proper Product for Your Intrinsically Safe Application
Before selecting the best protection method, examine the mix
of analog and digital signals, whether a ground is available,
amount of cabling required, and space in the control room.
There are enough options available now to simplify the
installation and reduce the system costs.
Many different products will make a sensor
or instrument intrinsically safe. Many times selecting the
correct product is troublesome for the first time user. For a
complete explanation on how to select the proper barrier refer
to the website. www:ISBARRIERS.com
Installation,
Maintenance and Troubleshooting of Intrinsically Safe Circuits
Explosionproof seals are not required if a suitable mastic is
used that prevents the transmission of gases. No special
maintenance for intrinsically safe circuits is required.
• Intrinsically safe circuits use normal
wiring practices, but care must be taken to separate and
identify these circuits.
• A proper grounding system will have
only one grounding point.
• There are five rules of grounding to
ensure the system is safe.
• Explosionproof seals are not required.
• Intrinsically safe seals must prevent
the transmission of gases.
• No special maintenance is required.
• Troubleshooting the system includes:
checking that the wiring is installed correctly, the circuit
is powered, the barrier resistance is not too high and the
fuse is not blown.
The intrinsically safe system must be
properly installed and provisions must be made to maintain and
troubleshoot it. These provisions are discussed in detail in
Article 504 of the National Electrical Code (NEC)
and the ANSI/ISA RP 12.6-1987 Recommended Practice
Installation of Intrinsically Safe Systems For Hazardous
(Classified) Locations.
Wiring
Intrinsically safe circuits may be wired in the same manner as
comparable circuits installed for unclassified locations with
two exceptions summarized as separation and identification.
These wiring practices are simple and clear; however, they
often are overlooked and are the source of potential problems.
The intrinsically safe conductors must be separated from all
other wiring by placing them in separate conduits or by a
separation of a minimum of 2 inches of air space. Within an
enclosure the conductors can be separated by a grounded metal
or insulated partition (see figure
6).
Barrier
Installation
The barriers normally are installed in a dust- and
moisture-free IP 54 or NEMA 4 or 12 enclosure located in the
non-classified area. Only the barrier outputs are
intrinsically safe. Conductive dust or moisture could lessen
the required distance of 2 inches between intrinsically safe
and non-intrinsically safe conductors (see figure
7). The enclosure should be as close as possible to the
hazardous area to minimize cable runs and increased
capacitance of the circuit. If they are installed in a
hazardous area, they must be in the proper enclosure suited
for that area.
Grounding
First determine if the intrinsically safe barriers used in the
system are grounded or isolated. The isolated barriers
normally are larger, more expensive, and do not require a
ground for safety. The grounded safety barriers are smaller
and less expensive, but require a ground to divert the excess
energy. The main rules of grounding intrinsically safe systems
are:
• The ground path must have less then 1
ohm of resistance from the furthest barrier to the main
grounding electrode.
• The grounding conductor must be a
minimum 12 AWG.
• All ground path connections must be
secure, permanent, visible, and accessible for routine
inspection.
• A separate isolated ground conductor
normally is required since the normal protective ground
conductor (green or yellow/green wire) may not be at the same
ground potential because of the voltage drop from fault
currents in other equipment.
• For installations designed to Canadian
standards, the Canadian Electrical Code (Appendix F)
recommends redundant grounding conductors.
A poor grounding system can influence the
function of the system by creating noise on the circuit or
modifying the signals. Figure
8 shows an improperly grounded system. The numerous
grounding points create ground loops which can modify the
signals and induce stray voltages into the intrinsically safe
circuits. The correct method of grounding is shown in figure
4 where all the grounds are tied together at one single
point in the system.
Figure
9. Correct grounded system where all the grounds are tied
together at one single point in the system
Sealing
The requirements for sealing intrinsically safe circuits have
been discussed by a panel of experts and published in
"Seals for Intrinsically Safe Circuits," EC&M,
September 1992, pp. 48-49. The panel’s conclusion is that
boundary seals are required to prevent the transmission of
gases and vapors from the hazardous area to the non-hazardous
area, not to prevent passage of flames from explosions.
Explosionproof seals are not required as long as there is some
other mechanical means of preventing the passage of gases such
as positive pressure in the control room and/or application of
an approved mastic at cable terminations and between the cable
and raceway. Many experts generally agree that a commercially
available silicon caulk is a suitable mastic which would
minimize the passage of gases. This must, however, be
acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
When barriers are installed in
explosionproof enclosures, which are located in the hazardous
area, explosionproof seals are required on the enclosure (see figure
10). Since other conduits containing non-intrinsically
safe conductors between the hazardous and non-hazardous areas
require explosionproof seals, it is good practice to maintain
consistency and install explosionproof seals on the conduits
containing intrinsically safe conductors also. The exception
to this would be where multi-conductor shielded cable is used.
This cable may be difficult to seal in some explosionproof
fittings. However, it will be necessary to seal both the cable
terminations and between the cable and raceway to minimize the
passage of gases, vapors, or dust.
9.5.5
Maintenance
No special maintenance of intrinsically safe systems is
required. Once a year the barriers should be checked to ensure
that the connections are tight, the ground wiring has less
then one ohm of resistance, and the barriers are free from
moisture and dirt. Check the panel and conduits for separation
and identification of the intrinsically safe wiring. Never
test the barrier with an ohmmeter or other test instrument
while it is connected in the circuit (see figure
11). This bypasses the barrier and could induce voltages
into the intrinsically safe wiring.
9.5.6
Troubleshooting
If the intrinsic safety circuit does not operate properly once
it is completed and energized, follow these troubleshooting
guidelines:
• Make sure the connections are tight.
• Check the wiring to the appropriate
terminals against the control wiring diagram. A control wiring
diagram is defined by the NEC as "a drawing or
other document provided by the manufacturer of the
intrinsically safe or associated apparatus that details the
allowed interconnections between the intrinsically safe and
associated apparatus." These diagrams are easier to
obtain than in the past. Make sure that one of the
manufacturers provides not only diagrams which show the
interconnections between the field device and barriers, but
also wiring diagrams which demonstrate that the circuit
functions properly and is safe by comparing the safety
parameters of the field device and the barriers.
• Make sure the circuit is powered.
• Check to see if the resistance in the
barrier is too high for the circuit. As stated in the previous
articles in this series, circuits are analyzed for the proper
loop resistance (barrier and cable) and supply voltages. If
the circuit does not operate properly, check the circuit
against the design in the control wiring diagram.
• Check for a blown barrier fuse, by
disconnecting the barrier from the circuit and measuring the
end-to-end resistance of the barrier. If the ohmmeter
registers an infinite resistance, the fuse in the barrier is
blown. The fuse has opened because of a fault in the circuit,
so reevaluate the entire circuit before reinstalling a new
barrier.
9.5.7
Barrier Replacement
If the barrier’s fuse has opened, it usually is the result
of excessive voltage being applied to the barrier. This causes
the diode to conduct, which results in high current in the
fuse. After determining the cause of the excess voltage, the
barrier must be replaced. The procedure is to disconnect the
wiring from the safety barriers in the proper order of
non-hazardous terminal first, hazardous terminals next, and
the ground last. Cover the bare wire ends with tape, replace
the barrier, and then reverse the procedure to mount the new
barrier. Always install the ground first and disconnect the
ground last.
Paul Babiarz is manager of business
development for Cooper Crouse-Hinds, a leading
manufacturer of electrical products for hazardous
locations. He has a B.S. from the University of
Rochester; a M.S. from University of Michigan; and a MBA
from Syracuse University. Paul has over twenty years of
experience in hazardous areas and has published over 35
technical publications on the subject. He is a senior
member of IEEE and serves on the executive subcommittee
of the Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee as
chair of the International Subcommittee.
|