|
| |
 |
| Photo 1 |
| Stand-alone PV system near power lines |
|
| Photo 2 |
| Utility-interactive PV system under power lines |
|
| Photo 3 |
| Aluminum-framed PV modules |
|
| Photo 4 |
| ILSCO GBL4 DBT lug attached to PV module |
|
| Photo 5 |
| Improperly installed grounding hardware |
|
| Photo 6 |
| External ground-fault protection device |
|
|
|

IAEI
News>Issue Listing>September/October 2004>PV Systems—Should They Be Grounded?
PV Systems 
Should They Be Grounded? |
At first glance, the obvious answer is: Photovoltaic (PV) systems are no different from other electrical power systems, and of course they should be grounded as required by the NEC. The real question is: How critical is grounding PV systems?
|
|

At first glance, the obvious answer is:
Photovoltaic (PV) systems are no different from other
electrical power systems, and of course they should be
grounded as required by the National Electrical Code.
The real question is: How critical is grounding PV systems?
Let us examine the various features of PV
systems that relate to grounding. Most PV modules have
aluminum frames and circuit conductors. They must be installed
where trees, poles, or other high objects do not shade them.
These systems are frequently installed on the roofs of
buildings and are frequently the highest metallic objects in
the vicinity. As such, they are subject to surges from nearby
lightning strikes. In fact, mounted high on buildings, they
may act like air terminals (lightning rods).
With the significant monetary incentives in
California, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and elsewhere,
numerous PV systems are being installed in urban areas near
power transmission lines (see photos
1 and 2). As a
result of severe weather, earthquakes, or man-made disasters,
these transmission lines may come into contact with the PV
array in its exposed location.
The most common types of
utility-interactive PV systems use inverters that operate up
to 600 volts direct current (dc). This voltage is
significantly higher than the normal 208–240-volt ac found
in dwellings and small commercial buildings. Keeping those
voltages safely under control during the rare fault condition
is certainly important, a strong case for proper grounding.
PV modules can be expected to generate
dangerous amounts of energy (shock and fire hazards) when
exposed to the sunlight for the next 40–50 years or longer.
This is significantly longer than the life expectancy of most
other electrical generators. Today, deterioration of
residential wiring systems only slightly older is becoming a
problem, and the wiring systems used in PV systems are exposed
to the harsher outdoor environment. Durable grounding can help
to minimize future problems.
Do PV systems require quality grounding?
Yes, they do, for all of the reasons identified in the Code and then some. All PV systems will require equipment grounding
with the equipment grounding conductors. Most of the equipment
has metal enclosures that should be grounded by the normal
methods. If we look closely at PV systems, we see two areas
where they present some unique grounding issues. The first is
the grounding of the frames of PV modules (see the sidebar).
The second area relates to grounding the circuit conductors.
PV Inverters
Create Separately Derived Systems
The second area focuses on the fact that PV systems have dc
circuits and ac circuits and both must be properly grounded.
Although the NEC has parts of Article 250 that deal
with the grounding of ac systems and parts that deal with the
proper grounding of dc systems, it does not specifically deal
with systems that have both ac and dc components.
In Article 100, the definition of separately
derived systems includes PV systems and, in most cases,
this is correct. Most, but not all, PV systems (both
stand-alone systems and utility-interactive systems) employ an
inverter that converts the dc from the PV modules to ac that
is used to feed loads or the utility grid. These inverters use
a transformer that isolates the dc side of the system from the
ac side. The grounded dc circuit conductor is not directly
connected to the grounded ac circuit conductor. Although we
normally think of separately derived systems as applying only
to ac systems with transformers, in fact, the isolation
between ac and dc circuits in PV inverters makes many PV
systems also separately derived.
AC Grounding
As in any separately derived system, both parts must be
properly grounded. There is usually no internal bond between
the ac grounded circuit conductor and the grounding system
inside either stand-alone or utility-interactive inverters.
Both of these PV systems rely on the neutral-to-ground main
bonding jumper in the service equipment (utility-interactive
systems) or the bonding jumper in the first load center
(stand-alone systems) for grounding the ac side of the system.
DC Grounding
The dc side of the system must also be grounded when the
system voltage (open-circuit PV voltage times a
temperature-dependent constant) is above 50 volts. See NEC 690.41 for more details. NEC Table 690.7 gives the
temperature-dependent constant, and the application of this
constant usually indicates that PV systems with a nominal
voltage of 24-volts or greater must have the dc side grounded.
Only infrequently, do we find 12-volt dc systems that do not
have one of the dc circuit conductors grounded, and even those
systems must have an equipment grounding system (see NEC 690.43). Nearly all utility-interactive PV systems operate
with a nominal voltage of 48 volts or higher so they must have
one of the dc circuit conductors grounded.
Properly grounding the dc side of a PV
system is somewhat complicated by NEC 690.5 that
requires a ground-fault protection device (GFP) on some PV
systems. If the PV array is mounted on the roof of a dwelling,
690.5 requires that this device be included in the system to
reduce fire hazards. Many utility-interactive inverters have
an internal GFP. Inverters (both stand-alone and
utility-interactive) that are used in systems with PV modules
mounted on the roofs of dwellings that do not have the
internal GFP must have an external GFP installed in the system
(see photo 6). In
nearly all cases, these GFPs (either inside the inverter or
externally mounted) actually make the grounded circuit
conductor-to-ground bond.
For systems employing a GFP, there should
be no external bonding conductor, and to add one to these
systems would bypass the GFP and render it inoperative. A fine
print note has been proposed for the 2005 NEC to alert
installers and inspectors to the danger.
690.42
FPN: Equipment containing ground-fault protection devices as
required by 690.5 will have the single-point for dc grounding
included as a part of the equipment. Any grounding point
installed externally to the equipment would bypass any
internal ground-fault protection device.
In most dc systems, the negative conductor
is the grounded conductor.
A dc bond inside the inverter with a GFP or
a dc bond in a GFP external to the inverter establishes the
need for and connection location of a dc grounding electrode
conductor. Some inverters with an internal GFP have a terminal
designated for connecting the usual 8 AWG to 4 AWG grounding
electrode conductor. Other inverters are lacking this
connection. Some inverter manufacturers are providing a
field-installed lug kit for this connection that has been
evaluated by their listing agency. PV systems with externally
installed GFP devices will have an appropriate connection
place (and instructions) for the grounding electrode
conductor.
PV systems that do not have PV modules
mounted on the roofs of dwellings are not required to have the
690.5 GFP, but many inverters in those systems will have it
anyway. In those systems not requiring or having a GFP, then
the dc bonding jumper may be installed at any single point on
the PV output circuits, and this is where the dc grounding
electrode conductor should be connected.
And The Other End
of the Grounding Electrode Conductor?
There are two options for routing the ac and dc grounding
electrode conductors, and these should be clarified in a
proposed change to the 2005 NEC. Here is the wording of
the proposal:
690.47(C)
Systems with Alternating-Current and Direct-Current Grounding
Requirements
Photovoltaic
power systems with both alternating-current (ac) and
direct-current (dc) grounding requirements shall be permitted
to be grounded as described in (1) or (2).
(1)
A grounding electrode conductor shall be connected between the
identified dc grounding point to a separate dc grounding
electrode. The dc grounding electrode conductor shall be sized
according to 250.166. The dc grounding electrode shall be
bonded to the ac grounding electrode to make a grounding
electrode system according to 250.52 and 250.53. The bonding
conductor shall be no smaller than the largest grounding
electrode conductor, either ac or dc.
(2)
The dc grounding electrode conductor and ac grounding
electrode conductor shall be connected to a single grounding
electrode. The separate grounding electrode conductors shall
be sized as required by 250.66 (ac) and 250.166 (dc).
Summary
Grounding PV systems is at least as important as grounding
other electrical power systems. Unique PV hardware such as the
aluminum framed modules and inverters that isolate the dc
circuits from the ac circuits dictate that extra attention
should be directed toward making the grounding system reliable
and durable.
By the way, a proposal for the 2005 NEC may eliminate the requirement to ground one of the circuit
conductors in some PV systems.
For
Additional Information
If this article has raised questions, do not hesitate to
contact the author by phone or e-mail. E-mail: jwiles@nmsu.edu
Phone: 505-646-6105
A PV Systems
Inspector/Installer Checklist will be sent via e-mail to those
requesting it. A copy of the 100-page Photovoltaic Power
Systems and the National Electrical Code: Suggested Practices,
published by Sandia National Laboratories and written by the
author, will be sent at no charge to those requesting a copy
with their address by e-mail. The Southwest Technology
Development web site (http://www.nmsu.edu/~tdi ) maintains all
copies of the "Code Corner Columns" written by the
author and published in Home Power Magazine over the
last 10 years.
The author makes 6–8 hour
presentations on "PV Systems and the NEC" to
groups of 40 or more inspectors, electricians, electrical
contractors, and PV professionals for a very nominal cost on
an as-requested basis.
Sidebar
Grounding PV Modules
Grounding PV modules to reduce or
eliminate shock and fire hazards is necessary but
difficult. We typically use copper conductors for
electrical connections and the module frames are
generally aluminum (see photo
3). Copper and aluminum don’t mix as was
discovered in numerous fires in houses wired with
aluminum wiring in the 1970s. Many have a mill finish,
some are clear coated, and some are anodized for color.
The mill finish aluminum and any aluminum that is
scratched quickly oxidizes. This oxidation and any clear
coat or anodizing form an insulating surface that makes
for difficult long-lasting, low-resistance electrical
connections (e.g., frame grounding). The
oxidation/anodizing is not a good enough insulator to
prevent electrical shocks, but it is good enough to make
good electrical connections difficult.
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) who
tests and lists all PV modules sold in the U. S.
requires very stringent mechanical connections between
the various pieces of the module frame to ensure that
these frame pieces remain mechanically and electrically
connected over the life of the module. These
low-resistance connections are required because a
failure of the insulating materials in the module could
allow the frame to become energized at up to 600 volts
(depending on the system design). The National
Electrical Code requires that any exposed metal
surface be grounded if it could be energized. The
installer of a PV system is required to ground each
module frame. The Code and UL Standard 1703
require that the module frame be grounded at the point
where a designated grounding provision has been made.
The connection must be made with the hardware provided
using the instructions supplied by the module
manufacturer.
The designated point marked on the
module frame must be used since this is the only point
tested and evaluated by UL for use as a long-term
grounding point. UL has established that using other
points such as the module structural mounting holes
coupled with typical field installation
"techniques" do not result in low-resistance,
durable connections to aluminum module frames. If each
and every possible combination of nut, bolt, lock
washer, and star washer could be evaluated for
electrical properties and installation torque
requirements and the installers would all use these
components and install them according to the torque
requirements (we all have and use torque wrenches and
torque screw drivers don’t we?), it might be possible
to use the structural mounting holes for grounding.
Most U.S. PV module manufacturers are
providing acceptable grounding hardware and
instructions. Japanese module manufacturers are
frequently providing less-than-adequate hardware and
unclear instructions. Future revisions of UL 1703 should
address these issues. BP Solar is to be congratulated
for getting their module listing to include making new
grounding points at other locations than the marked
points.
In the meantime, installers have to
struggle with the existing hardware and instructions,
even when they are less than adequate. Southwest
Technology Development Institute has identified suitable
grounding hardware and provides that information when
installers ask about grounding—a frequent topic. And,
yes, we are using the hardware and methods described
below to ground PV modules in our new inverter test
facility when the modules have less than satisfactory
grounding hardware or no hardware at all.
For those modules that have been
supplied with inadequate or unusable hardware or no
hardware at all, here is a way to meet the intent of the Code and UL Standard 1703. Of course, ignoring
the manufacturer’s instructions and hardware (however
poor) is done at one’s own risk.
For those situations requiring an
equipment grounding conductor larger than 10 AWG, a
thread-cutting stainless steel 10-32 screw can be used
to attach an ILSCO GBL4 DBT lug to the module frame at,
or adjacent to, the point marked for grounding (see photo
4).
A #19 drill is required to make the
proper size hole for the 10-32 screw. The 10-32 screw is
required so that at least two threads are cut into the
aluminum (a general UL requirement for connections of
this kind). The thread-cutting screw is required so that
an airtight, oxygen-free mating is assured between the
screw and the frame to prevent the aluminum from
re-oxidizing. It is not acceptable to use the hex-head
green grounding screws (even when they have 10-32
threads) because they are not listed for outdoor
exposure and will corrode eventually. The same can be
said for other screws, lugs, and terminals that have not
been listed for outdoor applications. Hex-head stainless
steel "tech" screws and sheet metal screws do
not have sufficiently fine threads to make the necessary
low-resistance, mechanically durable connection. The
only thread-cutting, 10-32 stainless steel screws that
have been identified so far have Phillips heads; not the
fastest for installation.
The ILSCO GBL4 DBT lug is a lay-in
lug made of solid copper and then tin-plated. It has a
stainless steel screw to hold the wire. It accepts a 14–4
AWG copper conductor. It is listed for direct burial use
(DB) and outdoor use and can be attached to aluminum
structures (the tin plate). The much cheaper ILSCO GBL4
lug looks identical, but is tin plated aluminum, has a
plated screw, and is not listed for outdoor use. I have
not been able to identify an alternative to the GBL4 DBT,
but continue to search.
If the module grounding is to be
accomplished with a 14–10 AWG conductor, then the
ILSCO lug is not needed. Two number 10 stainless-steel
flat washers would be used on the 10-32 screw and the
copper wire would be wrapped around the screw between
the two flat washers that would isolate the copper
conductor from contact with the aluminum module frame.
Yes, we would all like to use the
module mounting structure for grounding. The Code allows metal structures to be used for grounding and
even allows the paint or other covering to be scraped
away to ensure a good electrical contact. We see
numerous types of electrical equipment grounded with
sheet metal screws and star washers. This works on
common metals like steel, but not on aluminum due to
oxidation.
Unfortunately, many PV systems are
being grounded improperly even when the proper hardware
has been supplied. Photo
5 shows that even the proper hardware can be
misused. Here, the stainless-steel isolation washer has
been installed in the wrong sequence and the copper
grounding wire is being pushed against the aluminum
frame, a condition sure to cause corrosion and loss of
electrical contact in the future.
|
John Wiles works at the Southwest
Technology Development Institute (SWTDI) at New Mexico State
University. SWTDI has a contract with the US Department of
Energy to provide engineering support to the PV industry and
to provide that industry, electrical contractors,
electricians, and electrical inspectors with a focal point for
code issues related to PV systems. He serves as the secretary
of the PV Industry Forum that submitted 30 proposals for
Article 690 in the 2005 NEC. He provides draft comments to
NFPA for Article 690 in the NEC Handbook. As an old solar
pioneer, he lives in a stand-alone PV-power home in suburbia
with his wife, two dogs and two cats—permitted and
inspected, of course.
This work was supported by the United
States Department of Energy under Contract DE-FC04-00AL66794
|
|
|