Sign In  |  Register Now  Why Register?

 
 

 
Featured Images
Figure A  
An overhead drop to a building which utilizes an RNC installation with a weather head

Figure B
A safety switch and a junction box, both of which are securely mounted

Figure C
Illustrates a run of RNC between a panel and a wireway with an elbow between them

Figure D
An illustration of a typical expansion fitting installation.

Figure E


 

 
IAEI News>Issue Listing>November/December 1998>A Closer Look—A Case of Movement
A Closer Look
A Case of Movement
The inspector had been called in on the case to see if an explanation could be given as to what had happened. He was very puzzled as he closely examined the rigid nonmetallic conduit installation.
by Wayne Lilly


The inspector had been called in on the case to see if an explanation could be given as to what had happened. He was very puzzled as he closely examined the rigid nonmetallic conduit installation. There were several broken straps as well as a broken solvent weld where the rigid nonmetallic conduit entered a junction box. Who had caused such damage to the installation? What had they used to pry apart the solvent weld without leaving any marks? The broken straps didn’t appear to have been hit with a hammer or other heavy object. What happened here? How could this case be explained?

The explanation is simple. What we have here is a case of movement. Rigid nonmetallic conduit (RNC) has found wide acceptance in modern electrical installations. There are actually different types of RNC available. The type we are probably most familiar with is polyvinyl chloride. The expansion and contraction characteristics for each of these types is different. For example, polyvinyl chloride conduit and fiberglass reinforced epoxy conduit are both rigid nonmetallic conduits. However, each of them has its own characteristics including different coefficients of linear expansion. This means they expand and contract as a result of temperature changes at different rates. Although the Code® requirements are the same for each type of rigid nonmetallic conduit, due to the differing coefficients of linear expansion, the results of the calculation made to determine the amount of expansion and contraction will vary. For the sake of this article we will be making our calculations based on the coefficient of linear expansion of rigid nonmetallic conduit made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC).

Rigid nonmetallic conduit first appeared in the 1962 NEC as a new Article 347. At the time, it was somewhat revolutionary as no other nonmetallic raceways were permitted by the Code. Rigid nonmetallic conduit laid the necessary ground work to allow the later acceptance of such raceways as electrical nonmetallic tubing, nonmetallic wireways, and surface nonmetallic raceways.

The 1996 NEC Article 347 differs only slightly in requirements from the 1962 version. One of those differences occurs in Section 347-9. The 1996 NEC not only requires consideration be given to expansion and contraction, as was required by the 1962 version, but also provides a specific beginning threshold at which fittings are to be utilized to provide for such expansion and contraction. It states, "Expansion fittings for rigid nonmetallic conduit shall be provided to compensate for thermal expansion and contraction where the length change, in accordance with the tables in Chapter 9, is expected to be 0.25 in. (6.36 mm) or greater in a straight run between securely mounted items such as boxes, cabinets, elbows, or other conduit terminations."

Expansion and contraction of RNC equal to or exceeding 0.25 inch may result in damage to the raceway, fittings, supports, and boxes. Such movement can pull the raceway out of a fitting or box and break straps, boxes, and fittings. Because of the potential for damage to items associated with the installation of RNC as well as the RNC, it is necessary to consider whether or not expansion or contraction will meet the stated threshold thereby requiring the installation of fittings to compensate for the movement of the RNC. This article is intended to provide some guidance on the application of the requirements in Section 347-9 as they relate to expansion and contraction of RNC.

There are two requirements in 347-9 which need to be considered in determining whether or not an expansion fitting is required. The first of these requirements is the amount of expansion and contraction of the RNC. The amount of expansion and contraction is a property of the material itself. For instance, polyvinyl chloride will have the same amount of expansion or contraction for each degree of temperature change. The same is true of rigid steel conduit, the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the brick we build our homes out of. Each of them will have a certain amount of movement for each degree of temperature change. As the temperature increases expansion takes place and as temperature decreases contraction occurs.

The second requirement which needs to be considered when determining the need for an expansion fitting is whether or not the RNC is installed between securely mounted items. As temperatures increase and decrease the RNC is caused to expand and contract. This movement is restricted by securely mounted items. This results in stress being applied to straps, fittings, termination points, solvent welds, etc. If enough stress is applied, something has to give.

The wording found in Section 347-9 requires compliance with the Section when RNC is installed "between securely mounted items such as boxes, cabinets, elbows, or other conduit terminations." Figure A shows an overhead drop to a building which utilizes an RNC installation with a weather head. Because the weather head is not "securely mounted" to the building, an expansion fitting is not required. The RNC will freely expand and contract away from or toward the securely mounted meter base. It is important to provide enough room for expansion to occur. If the weatherhead were located beneath an overhang or other obstruction which would not allow the RNC to move, it is possible that as the RNC bowed due to the pressure applied from expanding against a fixed item, such as a roof overhang, a strap, a coupling, or other item would break.

Figure B shows a safety switch and a junction box, both of which are securely mounted. If the amount of expansion or contraction equals or exceeds the threshold of 0.25 inch, movement of the RNC installed between these two items may result in damage to the raceway, straps, fittings, terminations, etc.

Figure C illustrates a run of RNC between a panel and a wireway with an elbow between them. The language in 347-9 requires consideration be given to expansion and contraction "between securely mounted items such as boxes, cabinets, elbows or other conduit terminations." In this installation, we need to consider the run of RNC on each side of the elbow separately to determine the need for an expansion fitting. If the movement on either side equals or exceeds 0.25 inch, an expansion fitting would be required.

Let’s take a step by step look at how to determine whether or not an expansion fitting is required. The first step is to determine the minimum and maximum temperatures to which the RNC will be exposed. As an aid, you may contact the local official weather station to obtain the maximum and minimum temperatures. For the sake of developing an illustration, we’ll utilize the same temperature extremes I use in my locality. The temperature range I use for RNC installations outdoors is from 15°F below zero in the winter to 115°F above zero in the summer. This means that RNC installed outdoors will be exposed to a total temperature range of 130°F. I am aware of some manufacturers who recommend that an additional 30°F be added for installations where the RNC will be exposed to radiant heating from sunlight exposure. This is illustrated by a rooftop installation where the RNC is subjected to the changes in the ambient temperature as well as direct sunlight exposure resulting in additional heating of the RNC.

The next step is to determine the amount of change in length the RNC will have based on this temperature range. Remember that Section 347-9 requires that we use the tables in Chapter 9 to determine the length change of RNC. There is only one table currently in Chapter 9 which details the information needed to determine the length change. Table 10 is divided into alternating columns of temperature change and length change. We begin by finding our temperature range in the appropriate temperature change column. Counting from left to right, the fifth column contains the 130°F temperature range we are looking for. Moving to the immediate right of this entry we find that the length change for PVC RNC is 5.3-inches per 100 feet of PVC RNC. This means that the PVC RNC will expand or contract 5.3-inches for each 100 feet of length when it is exposed to a temperature change of 130°F. This is a length change of .053-inch per foot [5.3-in/100 ft = .053-in per foot]. For a run of 20-feet "between securely mounted items such as boxes, cabinets, elbows, or other conduit terminations," there would be a total length change of 1.06-inches [.053-in x 20-ft = 1.06-inches] for a temperature change of 130°F.

Having determined that the total length change exceeds the threshold of 0.25-in., our next step is to install the expansion fitting. The expansion fitting consists of two pieces, a barrel and a piston. Referring to Figure D we see an illustration of a typical expansion fitting installation. Because the piston moves inside the barrel, it is important that the piston and barrel are aligned to prevent the piston from binding. The barrel portion of the fitting is to be securely fastened in place and the piston is then installed so it will move, as the RNC expands and contracts, inside the barrel. This means the length of conduit solvent welded to the piston must be allowed to move. I am aware of at least one manufacture of RNC who makes clamps that are designed to allow movement in conduit trade sizes up through 2-inches. Metal conduit and tubing straps may be utilized if they are sized slightly larger than the outside diameter of the RNC so movement will be allowed and they are installed so the conduit will not bind on the strap as it expands and contracts. It is important here to remember the language in Section 347-8 requires "Rigid nonmetallic conduit shall be fastened so that movement from thermal expansion or contraction will be permitted." However, it is equally important to remember the language also requires "conduit shall be securely fastened within 3 ft (914 mm) of each outlet box, junction box, device box, conduit body, or other conduit termination." This means the RNC must be securely fastened within 3-feet of a termination while doing so in a manner which still allows for any necessary linear expansion and contraction to take place.

The piston is equipped with at least one o-ring to seal against the entrance of dirt, water, insects, etc. into the system. There are at least some expansion fittings I am aware of which are listed as being water-tight as long as the piston is installed so it moves horizontally or upward, rather than downward, into the barrel. This installation configuration will prevent water from possibly entering the conduit system by way of the small gap between the piston and the barrel. This is an unlikely occurrence due to the o-ring seal and the close tolerances between the barrel and the piston. However, it is a remote possibility and the installation of the fitting so the piston is not located above the barrel will preclude the entrance of water under normal conditions.

The expansion fitting must be installed based on the temperature at the time of installation relative to the total temperature change to which the conduit will be exposed. For instance, if the PVC RNC is being installed at a time when the temperature is 60°F, the straps, boxes, elbows, etc. will be installed with the PVC RNC length at the 60°F length. As the PVC RNC is exposed to temperatures above or below 60°F then the length of the PVC RNC will change based on its coefficient of linear expansion. So, we have to determine at what point the expansion fitting piston has to be set relative to its total movement.

Expansion fittings are available with different maximum expansions such as 2-inch or 6-inch. Let’s use the information provided above to determine what the setting would be for an expansion fitting with a total movement of 6-inches. Remember, we have a temperature range of 130°F and a temperature at the time of installation of 60°F. To determine the piston opening we subtract the temperature at the time of installation from the maximum temperature to which the PVC RNC will be exposed, divide it by the total temperature range to which the PVC RNC will be exposed, and multiply the result by the total movement of the expansion fitting. Plugging in the numbers for our installation we do the following:

Piston Opening = [(Max Temp - Installation Temp) / Total Temp Range] x Fitting Length

Piston Opening = [(115°F - 60°F) / 130°F] x 6-inches

Piston Opening = [(55°F) / 130°F] x 6-inches

Piston Opening = .42 x 6-inches

Piston Opening = 2.52 inches

The next step is to insert the piston into the barrel to its maximum depth and make a mark on the piston at the end of the barrel. (Refer to Figure E) This mark represents the maximum depth to which the piston can go into the barrel. This is unnecessary in some cases as there are manufacturers who have already placed a mark on the piston to indicate the maximum depth. To set the piston based on the information given above, we pull the piston out a distance of 2.52-inches from the mark we made earlier. This setting will allow the PVC RNC to expand and contract within its range as he piston slides in and out of the barrel.

I hope this article has helped in giving you an understanding of how to apply the provisions of Section 347-9. It is important to remember that PVC RNC is an excellent product and needs to be installed in conformance with the Code requirements to address the possible damage to PVC RNC installations.


Wayne Lilly, senior building codes inspector for the city of Harrisburg, Virginia, has been the principal representative for IAEI on Code-Making Panel No. 8 since 1991. He is a certified master electrician, a member of the IAEI Education Committee, chairman of the Southern Section Education Committee, a past chairman of the National Certification Program for Construction Code Inspectors Electrical Test Development Committee, and a member of the American National Standards Institute C-80 Committee.

 

 
Training Facilities Taking Shape
 

 

 

 

 

Home  | Join | Advertising | Seminars | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Legal Notices
Copyright © 1997-2008 IAEI. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

Current Issue Home Page Issue Listing Series Focus on the Code Reprints Contacts Subscribe